RukoFamicom admin report

In-game misconduct:

CKEY: Billcyferka

Your Discord: Billcyferka999

Offender’s CKEY: RukoFamicom

Offender’s In-Game Name (if relevant):

Date (YYYY-MM-DD): 2024-11-03

Round Number:50543 and 50542

Rules Broken (if relevant):

Part of Admin/Mentor Conduct Broken (if relevant):

Incident Description: Round 50542: I roll traitor. Ruko immediately removes my traitor and tells me he wants to see me play as crew. I am the chef so I cook a bit, chit-chat with the bartender, and get drunk, make kebab for a miner. On the shuttle, there is a guy murdering people so I step in with my butchering knife to help but get critted and once I am back up from clown’s help, I continue to fight hoping that the threat will be contained but die. Round 50543: I start as sci, researching stuff and then Ruko starts asking me irrelevant questions and bans me for 2 months for apparent lack of RP for charging at the traitor murdering people. I will not stand around and do nothing while my friends are getting murdered on the escape shuttle as doing so would be an even more serious lack of RP, being ignorant and oblivious to the conditions around me.

Additional Information:

2 Likes

After yet another very questionable/borderline antagonist round followed by a really concerning statement in dead chat, rather than escalating to a ban for prior rounds I decided I’d rather give you a chance to show your RP as a regular crew member. I can’t build a good view of how you’re role-playing when I have exclusively seen you as an antagonist.

This round was your sixth consecutive antagonist round. I exercised rule 0 discretion and informed you that this was the case, and even told you I wanted to observe how you handle a regular crew member round. You handled it by standing AFK in the kitchen for a considerable amount of time, and by acting excessively valid-thirsty at round end.

Both of these bans were applied with regard to both your antagonist conduct and rather lacking RP in general. I stand by my actions.

1 Like

To elaborate on this from my point of view - you witness someone being attacked and decide to attack the winner of the fight without knowing anything further about either of them.

They choose to crit rather than killing all three of the other players that got involved. All three players involved get medical care which they allow to happen. They never finished you off, only disabled your ability to fight back.

Then after they allow you to receive medical care, the first thing you do is bumrush them again as soon as you’re standing before the medical treatment is even complete.

I was afk in the kitcher for a mere 10 minutes when shuttle was coming when I had to eat in real life. Please do not exaggerate such statements. I cooked food and done my job properly and talked with people. As for the antag ban, you should know that alien sentinels never spawn on the station. This comment in deadchat was blatantly sarcastic. Yet another exaggeration was when I was lingering in dead chat for ghost roles. I simply had to do something IRL and someone else was on the computer and I came back after a few minutes. Please do not view all actions as inherently malicious as I do other things beyond space station 13 and I do not understand why you would view being AFK with such malice.

2 Likes

The had a visible assistant ID and were armed with gear that no assistant would ever possess such as security gear and an esword. That was enough to me and and others around me to know that they are up to no good and need to be contained.

I’ll beat the headmins to it and tell you if ruko did not break any admin conduct or rules then this should not be a staff report and should instead be a ban appeal.