Multiple players validhunting

In-game report:

CKEY: QuaintSun1

Your Discord: Roentgenium

Offender’s In-Game Name: Several. Hard to tell from my personal logs, as many players seemed to attempt to land hits but not hit due to the confusion

Date (YYYY-MM-DD): 12/01/2026

Round Number: 55219

Rules Broken: No validhunting

Incident Description:

As a blood brother, I openly attacked Vasiliy in the kitchen (accidenally went for the wrong target lol). What followed was about five peole and a borg all pursuing me, with be being chain-shoved several times. This was all with an active sec officer involved. The players were not spectating - they were all directly adjacent to one-another, often swapping places with eachother in their attempts to get at me. I understand for Neeus, as he was an antag, but this was like a lynch mob.

Jazlyn Stephenson and Kiyomi seemed like the worst offenders. Kiyomi was actively shoving me and kicking me to allow for sec to arrest, even when I had fled far from where I committed the crime. SUL-4 was captain, so it’s not as bad

3 Likes

iirc while people can defend someone if they were just attacked out in the open, i figure

yomi was actively shoving me and kicking me to allow for sec to arrest, even when I had fled far from where I committed the crime.

chasing sorta changes it.

4 Likes

this chase went from the meta kitchen to below the sec corridor

3 Likes

As a person who was mostly observing despite being a changeling (I have wrongly read I should rescue above 5 than to cull the numbers down beyond 5), I noticed there are multiple peoples joining into the fight, not just chasing someone away from the scene to protect someone.
Peoples swinging into the medbay and out, chasing after the reporter. If I weren’t a changeling, I wouldn’t be chasing them down even when they took the mech and used that to kidnap their target because there were 2 officers already chasing the person since the beginning of the combat. Reason why I joined into the combat once they kidnapped their target was, again, my mistake of reading the objective wrong.
More than 3 peoples were tagging behind on the medbay, aside from the officer. Borg was justified, saying human harm was constantly be made. Rest of the peoples? Not so much.

2 Likes

Like what Harry said, I was the cyborg in this situation that heard and then saw that human harm was being committed while being on the Asimov lawset, so I was upholding my laws by attempting to prevent it and whisk them away from the kitchen to Medbay, and at no moment did I attempt to attack you. I can’t say with certainty how justified the others involved were, though.

3 Likes

Yeah, i’ve seen few people chasing them when they stole my body with Odysseus, which was rather weird.

4 Likes

You as the borg and Nav were completely justified. I should have explicity said, but this report isn’t about you

3 Likes

Should be worked on in 48+/-hrs ദ്ദി

I was SUL-4! Me, HOS and a secoff were onto you since we hear something happened in the kitchen. I chased a guy trying to escape inside a mech and a bunch of people followed me and attacked you too. Not sure how much the outcome would have changed if the people didn’t come, but their actions do seem to be in contratory to the idea that crewmembers are not to engage in combat as a capable fighter.

Edit: I’m not sure if I validhunted, if I did please notify me so i can take it as a lesson!

1 Like

Hot Potato~

Both were antags, one a vigilante and the other was a changeling in disguise. There was an additional player involved which was brand new, but they seemed to have had little effect on the situation overall and may have fallen victim to herd mentality given a lack of experience. For the CE/acting captain though, yes running to a crime scene you weren’t already a part of or a witness to and attacking someone is valid-hunting. You were the only person both experienced and unjustified involved here.

Your job as acting captain is to ensure security (and other departments) have staff and to direct them, not to partake in raids and takedowns or chase people through the hallway unless you were directly involved with or witness to the conflict as it unfolds. You are effectively the “king” in chess, the leader to be protected, not a frontline soldier unless necessary or the battle comes to you.

I’m pretty sure you know what validhunting is. This is only one example.

This situation hearkens back to the feedback I left in your character thread a few days ago:

shutting down the other player as fast and hard as you possibly can, and yet complain as if this happens to you whenever you lose a fight


You’ve been here for about two years at this point and have built a record of misleading or lying to us and potentially feigning innocence on numerous occasions. You’ve been given benefit of a doubt many times because you may have just forgotten the details of the situation, or a particular rule slipped your mind or maybe you just really didn’t know yet. You have “probably” but unproveably metagrudged on a few occasions as well. Generally speaking though, most of your history of issues stems from a desire to kill or round remove other players as a result of impulsive behavior in some form or another, regardless of the exact label applied to the situation (overescalation, too killhappy as antag, etc.)

When you are not directly breaking the rules or being generally trigger happy though you are still most often a net negative presence on the server, either because you are skirting the lines of a rule or because you are just completely isolating yourself and ignoring or preventing interactions with other players from happening, if not outright ignoring the duties of your role.

I spoke with other staff regarding this situation and had nearly unanimous agreement that you need a stern warning that the gloves are coming off - You have used up all of your “benefit of a doubt” at this point and will not getting any further passes for not realizing something may have been against the rules. You will get no further chances when it comes to being misleading or lying as well. If it seems like you are lying it will be treated as malicious.

This is technically your first instance of validhunting, but given that you should definitely have an understanding of what that is based on your history I am going to be placing a week ban. Per the warning above, subsequent issues will result in rapidly escalating punishment if you do not improve.

4 Likes