Alright this used to be 3 reports into one, I’m splitting them because I’ve had a good night’s sleep. Daniels Mckendrick (Assistant) is being reported self antag, powergaming and lrp. This includes breaking into the armoury, taking enough supplies for himself and then some odd common chats.
After the brig situation with traitors and the AI, AI shouting crew harm and whatnot, CMO and only command died, sec was non existent, and there we see our daring grey tider in space breaking into the armoury from space. They get armor and a few weapons and we give him the benefit of the doubt, maybe they’ll be the hero the station needed at that point since everyone else was dead! Nope, they come out of the armoury, claim that “someone” stole guns from the armoury and then saying things like “who wants to fight sec?”. I’ll also mention the “Who’s bad” pda messages they sent to the AI. Oh they weren’t an antag btw.
They willingly walked into the bridge, almost non chalantely. I’m pretty sure they ASKED if the traitors needed help, not the other way around. They also had uber miner gear, and proceeded to boast about said gear while raiding the AI sat.
I mostly added this because I ahelped at the time, and since we’re adding opinion, I would personally love to see less restrictions on naming guidelines. It’s just that it seems unfair for some to have to change their names for more trivial things.
I don’t think their actions are quite as bad as they’d appear at a glance. Namely the “let’s go fight security” comment was almost certainly referring to the (only member of security) traitor detective who had openly shot two people to death with a stechkin.
Regardless you still shouldn’t be breaking into the armory and stealing weapons to try and fight the antags with. In a situation as chaotic as this you’d probably be able to justify nabbing a weapon for self defense, but you shouldn’t be directly trying to intervene in the conflict.