not really, the implication that donating money allows you to set the rules is false, because its still the staffs server and ultimatetly falls on the host and appointed head admin to implement what kind of decision making procsess they want to implement rules, and if they want to involve the community in that procsess or not.
Its essentially a crowdfunded D&D game where the host gets to make the games rules, they can say no racial slurs and if you dont agree you dont need to play.
Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.âIn this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.
Fucking learn what argument you are using before bringing it up. Karl Popper would be on the side opposing censorship, not supporting it.
do you not understand, Karl Popper in no way supported suppression of speech, not even the nazis. He was against the implementation of an intolerant government, not the âutterance of intolerant philosophiesâ
you think anyone who argues for slavery should be censored? Ban all of saudi arabia then because they just barely banned slavery in the 1960âs and it never really stopped.
right, so as rational thinkers here we can agree using a word repeatdly that relates to white ownership of black people that perhaps reminding any black player that stumbles onto the server of it constantly (because lets be real here, most of you are white) is a bad idea and maybe we should make a rule that prohibits it?
any country that advocates for modern slavery is bad, however it is illegal everywhere; the last country to outlaw it is Mauritania, however it still happens illegally.
No. We can each individually decide whether it should or should not be used and express that opinion to the world trying to spread that opinion with personal example and your own upstanding character, as well as presenting the reasoning for why that opinion is correct.