FancyPak - Permaban from MRP+LRP

CKEY: FancyPak

**Admin’s CKEY:**rukofamicon

Is this for both servers or just one? If so, which one: Both

Which server did the ban happen on? MRP

Ban Type: Perma

Ban Length: Forever

**Ban Date (MM/DD/YYYY):**08/15/2020

**Round ID:**19905

Ban Reason: Allready warned about ERP, demanded his master yiff with him as pAi

Appeal Reason: I understand fully the reasons for the ban, but I was following a misunderstood Law 1 which said to ‘Apologise for creating the CatVirus and say how much you love Yiff’ , I went above the law a bit too much. I also failed as a pAi, as I didnt know you had to discard laws such as this.

Additional Information: The person who wrote the law has also had action taken against them. I was also not ahelped/adminmessaged before the ban

1 Like

I mean, he is a dumbass, but as long as there is no sort of in game confirmation that you can, in fact, discard rule breaking laws, people will fall for it. I think that this ban should not go through, not to set a bad precedent in the future.

1 Like

If we could get saylogs that might help, but if it was just a law that they followed because they thought that had to, unbean

1 Like

[2020-08-15 10:17:27.960] SAY: FancyPak/(Mr. Snuggles) “HELP MY MASTER WANTS TO YIFF ME” (Departure Lounge (153, 53, 2))
[2020-08-15 10:19:20.503] SAY: FancyPak/(Mr. Snuggles) “I LOVE YIFF” (Medbay Central (160, 99, 2))
[2020-08-15 10:19:33.012] SAY: FancyPak/(Mr. Snuggles) “YIFF ME DADDY” (Central Primary Hallway (155, 104, 2))
[2020-08-15 10:19:41.330] SAY: FancyPak/(Mr. Snuggles) “YIFF ME” (Central Primary Hallway (170, 107, 2))

Directive stated to announce that you love Yiff, the person setting the directive was given their single warning because they are brand new to the server and council passed that folks can receive at least one chance to screw up in a minor way as long as it was just erotic and not full-on ERP.

Facts behind this ban:

  • Player has already been banned for CBT pasta
  • Player went beyond exactly what their directive said and really got into it
  • Player has a very high notes-to-hours ratio (1 note every 7 hours)
  • They were a silicon following directive, as opposed to doing it totally out of the blue.

I await other admin input, and given that I’m about to leave for a week I also leave up to first admin that wants to take the ban to take over the appeal. @Gameadmin

1 Like

Hard no from me. Maybe citadel is more your style?
If a sensible server can say you have managed to refrain from ERP related comms it could be lifted.

Would Colonial Marines be counted as a sensible server, thats where I mostly play on, I just sometimes get too carried away on bee

CM would be able to provide a vouch, yes. For now though, this is denied - appeal again in a couple of months or so when you have a vouch claiming you have avoided yiffing for that time.