So the above is understandable but also not. The instances when security and Captain are protected makes sense and I respect them but I have a few questions about the instances where they are not protected.
(You steal an assistant’s toolbelt after a fight and security starts shooting you with lethals)
So does this mean in ANY situation where immediate execution is not warranted you can attack back with lethals? Like a security officer lasering you for resisting arrest or the Captain attacking you with his saber with the intent to delimb or kill for breaking into bridge? Of course a security officer arresting you after raiding armory is okay but is it ok for them to lethal you for stealing one of their lockers?
So is it Major/Capital crimes or only Capital crimes?
I recommended to Ruko that we raise the acceptable standards for killing security officers and its finally being done but I do not understand it fully it.
Yesterday me and a few greytiders earned the right to keep our AA when we told the HoS we would protect the traitor chaplain who had an incursion on them. They told us we can only use the security LOBBY of the brig and we were not allowed anywhere else. I walked into the Warden’s office (WITHOUT THE INTENT TO GO INTO ARMORY) which was open and was bolt open purposely so SECURITY officers can come through, they started lasering me and I had the chance to kill them when I slipped one but I decided not to since I do not know the rules. The same round one of my greytider buddies pranked security by firing Tesla gun rounds at them and they lasered me even though I didn’t do anything once again I decided not to lethal back, was I valid to kill them or did I do the right thing by letting them crit/kill me?