- Yes
- No
Currently Bee has no minimum age recommendation nor restriction despite the community being overwhelmingly in favour of it and it’s upstream /tg/ being 18+ only.
I’ve argued in this thread that Bee should have an 18+ restriction (like similarly violent games), and Crossed has asked me to open a new topic for this which I have done here. Replies to their last post below:
For the above agencies, for ESRB the difference in rating Teen vs Mature is “violence, minimal blood” vs “intense violence, blood and gore”. SS13 has lots of blood especially when you chop of peoples’ limbs or gib them, and with the huge variety of visceral murder methods it’s clearly intense violence.
For PEGI the difference between PEGI 12 and 16 is “non-realistic violence” vs “violence that looks the same as real life”. People can get delimbed, beheaded, cremated, gibbed etc which are all realistic methods of violence and murder. It’s not like videogame characters in Breath of the Wild who can get axed in the face and are visibly no worse for wear.
But the short descriptions of these ratings are insufficient - let’s look at 2D games with similar levels of gore. Hotline Miami, Doom 2 and Mortal Kombat Advance are all rated Mature, for 17+ by ESRB.
Despite my particular argument for a 17+ rating, I will note at this point that Bee doesn’t even have a 13+ rating and instead welcomes kids of all ages.
I don’t see the relevance here, the servers are based in Germany and they do prohibit minors from purchasing M or R rated media.
Any breach of these regulations is an offence pursuant to Art. 28 of the German Children and Young Persons Protection Act (JuSchG) and is punishable by a fine of up to €50,000 [source]
Due to the nature of SS13 being an online game the ratings agencies refuse to give an official ranking. It’s theredown down to the server hosts to adequately protect children by giving an age recommendation or resstriction themselves.
This is similar to if a developer released an online virtual porn game - it doesn’t absolve them from any moral obligation to warn children that they’ll be exposed to such content, even if official ratings agencies won’t rank them.
If I had a 10 year old who found this cool looking 2D game then I looked over their shoulder to find that they were getting beheaded and their head was stuck on a spear thereafter, the first thing I’d be looking for is the warnings that the game host put up to prevent my child from being exposed to such content, so I can then find out why they weren’t heeded.
Whilst it’s obviously not a magical fix-all, adult content exists everywhere online and to protect their children parents teach them at an early age to pay attention to such warnings. The fact that there are no warnings at all to prevent pre-teens from being exposed to this content is disturbing.
It does indeed protect younger children from being exposed to explicit content. Not as much as asking for their actual identification would, but a simple warning goes a long way and is clearly a sufficient enough deterrent that porn sites around the world are legally required to do this. I’m surely not the only person in the world who’s ever clicked away from a site when they were younger and saw that 18+ content warning before being allowed access.