CKEY: NEVERDOGSHISMATES
Admin’s CKEY: MC_MUELLER
Is this for both servers or just one? If so, which one: The one with more players.
Ban Type: Days.
Ban Length: 3 Days.
Ban Date (MM/DD/YYYY): Today
Round ID: 35144
Ban Reason:
The misguided and unjust murder of a Chemist, which actually was very just when you look at things from my point of view.
Appeal Reason:
Hello, I come to you here not as my character who was a Finnish Lawyer named Pekka Oranssi, but as a external computer player whose conduct on this server was cut tragically short as I attempted to defend the better virtues, morals, and life living on the space station 13. I will tell you in the additional information section how my character was roleplayed correctly and accurately to the character I was portraying, and how my roleplay was conducive to better gameplay for the server around me. I will also convince you as to how the admin had shaded pit vipers on their head that stopped them from seeing my good conduct, and how the Chemist I hunted down in the name of the law was deservedly ended.
Additional Information:
Our conflict begins with the introduction of the Chemist, Elias Wilkerson, who walked into a Bar and attempted to poison the drinks with napalm. After his attempts were rejected by the Barkeep, he tossed a glass at him and I took grave offense to the molestation both of the Barkeep’s public property and of the Barkeeper’s personal health.
My character, Pekka Oranssi was drunk at the time, for he had just drunk an entire glass of some nefariously bitter but delicious liquid. Nevertheless, as a lawyer through and through at heart, he pursued the Chemist relentlessly to Chemistry where he demanded he apologised. You may see the first exchange below:
You point at Elias Wilkerson.
Elias Wilkerson slurs, “What.”
Pekka Oranssi slurs, “Do a krime BURP. LahWSUIT!!!”
Pekka Oranssi slurs, “Apologichche tu ttha’ Bahrtender.”
Pekka Oranssi slurs, “Perk’ele.'.”
Elias Wilkerson slurs, “No.”
Pekka Oranssi slurs, “Apul’u’gich’e, yeech.”
Elias Wilkerson grabs you passively!
Pekka Oranssi bashed Elias Wilkerson in the human chest with the briefcase!
Pekka Oranssi bludgeoned Elias Wilkerson in the human chest with the briefcase!
Elias Wilkerson slurs, “Ahh fooc’k.”
Elias Wilkerson slurs, “I gggrabb’e’d ya.”
Pekka Oranssi slurs, “Perkele fookker.”
Elias Wilkerson slurs, “Dic’k.”
Pekka Oranssi slurs, “Apuulugise Bahrtender.”
(I will not post any more logs from this point on, as they are accessible to admins, and it takes me too long to snip them adequately 
)
Was my character belligerent? Yes.
Was my character belligerent for good reason? Also yes.
For my character had seen this Chemist attempt to maim or kill people in the Bar, by pouring a substance as deadly as napalm into their glasses, and as drunk as he had, and with Security not responding, he had no other course of action but to ensure the Chemist repented for his ways and apologised to all he had harmed. As this server is a roleplaying server, I believe my character was adequately roleplayed, and the Chemist was inadequately roleplayed. For who else but an insane person would attempt to poison the drinks of the crew, and then not apologise? My character was an avenger of the law unserved at this instance.
From this point onwards, a great conflict begins! I smack him with my briefcase, and he attempts to gouge out my eyes with a screwdriver. This conflict has three beginnings, and two interruptions. In our first conflict, the Warden stops the two of us, and seeing the reason of good justice; imprisons the Chemist for eye-gouging and napalm poisoning. However, the Warden is busy, and unable to investigate the true depths of the matter, and thus we are left alone again. At this point however, I am unaware the conflict will continue, for I have thought having served a criminal sentence that the Chemist was a newfound man on release. Unfortunately not to be the case, as he returned to the Bar to chuck smoke grenades at me. I survived each attempt, by running away from the smoke.
Anyway, as I track him down and demand he apologise again, and he once more tells me to fuck off, we fight once more. In this fight however, he has a hulked up comrade attempt to punch my skull off my neck as he gouges my eyes once more with his trusty screwdriver. Terrifyingly competent at combat I may be, I am forced to flee for my life as the hulk attempts to murder me alongside his chemist’s camaraderie. I survive this attempt at the end of our altercation by fleeing to security, and the Warden is able to adequately patch me up.
Recovered from my deep and daring wounds, I must avenge this grave injustice that this Chemist thinks he is allowed to inflict on others, and the Bartender. For not once has he allowed, and many more times has he chucked weird looking grenades at me. So I pick up a toolbox and I crunch his skull with it until it’s about half as flat as it was before. His scalpel is nowhere near as efficient as my batterings, so I win the conflict, and put him in the disposals (where criminal trash belongs). At this point, I consider my job as a Lawyer truly complete, and I am taken away by the Warden; it is at this point that Pit Viper wearing Mc_Mueller attacks me over PMs.
INTENSE AGGRESSIVE VITRIOLIC PRANA ATTACK.
PM to-Admins: wad da fugg is the force value of the briefcase
Admin PM from-Mc_meiler: Is there a reason you killed the chemist?
PM to-Admins: yeah, do you mind holding up while i explain it ingame
Admin PM from-Mc_meiler: You explain it here, now.
PM to-Admins: yeah i get that you’re in a rush and all, but i’ve got this warden on me. i can explain it to you but you need to let me explain it ingame ok
PM to-Admins: ok done
Admin PM from-Mc_meiler: Explain.
PM to-Admins: yeah the chemist tried to poison drinks with napalm, refused to answer to my requests for a lawsuit explanation, and then started fights with me.
PM to-Admins: i won the fights despite him having a hulk buddy nearly punch my head off, simple as
PM to-Admins: he chucked multiple grenades at me too, after the first combat was closed wiht the warden.
Admin PM from-Mc_meiler: So you not only massively over-escalated by starting to attack and kill a person because of an argument, but you also attempted to break into chemistry for seemingly no reason.
PM to-Admins: be honest with me, are u looking at the vars and logs or are u shaking hands with the chemist in some backroom deal.
PM to-Admins: idk how old u are buddy but generally when speaking to people u dont assume the worst and speak nasty and aggressive with them while they're not doing the same to u, thats just etiquette my friend
Admin PM from-Mc_meiler: I don’t know if you’ve read ticket conduct, but this is not how you speak to an admin. So, you saw the chemist putting napalm into drinks, and you thought the best course of action is to break into their workspace and murder them?
PM to-Admins: well buddy it’s a game, nice and casual as far as things go. you’re an admin in a videogame not my boss lol. anyway, you have logs and variables and those logs and variables have timestamps so i can break down the schedule of things and u can verify them
PM to-Admins: he tried to poison drinks with napalm, i went into chemistry and confronted him over it yea?
PM to-Admins: we then fought after he refused to answer or apologise to the bartender, that stopped outside security and he went to prison for trying to gouge my eyes out with screwdrivers
PM to-Admins: i did not pursue him after that, until he came into the bar and threw grenades at me, and became a nuisance
Admin PM from-Mc_meiler: You yelled “FUGGAN” “LAWSUIT!” then proceeded to attack the chemistry desk, then the chemist.
PM to-Admins: after that, i went back to fighting with him, he doubleteamed me wiht a hulk and nearly punched my head off. we break for a bit there when i get healed, and then i get him for real while he's trying to cut me up
PM to-Admins: yeah, you can point out that, and then you can look at the other verbal logs where i explain why i am there and that he has to apologise to the bartender.
PM to-Admins: its pretty close together as far as things go. the briefcase does no damage to reinforced windows, so i was drawing his attention, you can say i was breaking in but i didn't actually break anything lol
Admin PM from-Mc_meiler: You realize we’re a roleplay server, correct? This is not what we expect our players to do. And in all honesty, I don’t believe you’re here in good faith, especially considering this is your first time on our server.
PM to-Admins: yeah, i roleplayed a finnish lawyer, and i explained my case to him. he told me to fuck off and get lost with no interaction. then he wordlessly showed up and chucked grenades at me. if anything he did no roleplaying in good faith lol.
Admin PM from-Mc_meiler: Think you need a break to read over our rules and escalation policy.
PM to-Admins: well buddy, i think u need ot pull up ur pants and do some proper adminning lol
As any man may see, the conversation is unfortunately tainted by the opening dialogue exchange of Mc_Mueller. For he is not open to direct conversation and cooperation to come to a well-trained conclusion, but is rather poisoned (perhaps by the Chemist’s acidic tongue) by a negative perspective. In all the exchanges as I attempt to explain that the murder was the end result of escalation over poisoning drinks, absolute refusal to cooperate, and then his multitude of fights alongside the incredible chulk (chemistry hulk) and grenade tossings (nasty smoke!) at me that his death was nothing but the reasonable end outcome. In submission, I believe I am an adequate roleplayer, and MC_Mueller must taint his perspective less when he talks to people. This is a videogame server, not an USSR Human Resources Simulator, for any true conversation to happen, both parties must be open to good faith exchanges. Twisting words and making short and stubby demands is nothing but ill conduct to the betterment of the server. I do not blame Mc_Mueller however, for he likely spends a long time adminning this server without paycheck or compensation, and as a result I am not surprised he can be so aggressive. His shaded pitvipers obscured the better look of the logs that sided with me, and that is why he distilled a 30 minute long conflict to ‘this started over an argument’. I say no glasses in gaming (alcoholic or fashionable).
That is my final submission, I pick my briefcase up and walk on home (I got a long walk, I missed the bus).