Wiki isn’t always accurate, that’s only for crewsimov and Asimov ai
1 Like
see the line type. It’s a dotted line. that exists too between the CC official and Captain, and between Job crews and Assistant. This means they are really not in the chain of command, but they can interact by the chain up to their situation and condition.
- CC official’s authority is the same to Captain, but they don’t command usually, and the existence of a Captain will not allow that unless the station is shit. (this is why they can get AA when they arrived at a station to investigate.)
- Captain can actually send a message to CC through their console.
- Warden is supposed to have more impact than Security Officers in the security department, but it doesn’t mean they are superior than their fellow Security Officers. They’re like a paperworking Security Officer in a commanding center. Officers usually have no reason to be against Warden.
- Detective is the same as Warden.
- Everyone can command Assistant, as long as they decided to be ‘their assistant.’ Actually, It is more likely ‘requesting’ than commanding them.
- Everyone can command AI and Cyborg, as long as their law enforces them. Maybe ‘requesting’ than commanding too.
so, If you see ‘dotted lines’ as ‘requesting’ then It’ll be easier to understand.
So are there any round IDs that can be cited for this report?
Just like Cae said above I’m not going through every say log they have ever had.
1 Like
I think 33412 is relevant to this report, might be wrong though
I can’t get a round ID, just a very specific set of parameters to find one
i don’t think you understand ctrl+f would still show an unfathomably large amount of logs it’s still worthless, do you know how many things are logged each round?
1 Like
I’m looking for a very specific line, someone pushing the other in a specific room. There should be like, 4 results max
i dont know how the logs are sorted out but I’m pretty sure every round has its own file? so you still have to go round by round
It’s remotely possible, I wish I had access to the logs so I didn’t have to be like “admemes please find round”
This is something that almost certainly can be found.
And I will dig up the round ID assuming you ever actually make a different report thread like I suggested.
For the sake of my own sanity I cannot go over ever transgression Navy Nelson has made in the last year in a single player report.
Do not peanut post. Bee lore isn’t relevant, nor are the dozen other things being discussed. Cease or be forum banned.
7 Likes
From what I can see a majority of this report is just useless bickering back and forth that doesn’t actually contribute anything since no actual round IDs are provided. And the circumstances are vague enough to not really provide any useable keywords. In the future if you see something happen and you’d like to report it either grab the current round ID from the status tab or if the round has already ended there is a verb named ‘Your-Last-Round’ or something of the sort. Which you can use to get the ID of the last round you’ve played in.
The only things of substance here are:
A relevant round ID. Bit of salt towards the end of it but I personally wouldn’t consider it egregious enough to be actionable.
And this which is specific enough to find a round ID from but in my opinion falls outside the scope of this report and needs to be handled in it’s own separate thread.
In conclusion please use round IDs or very specific circumstances and keep the scope of each report reasonable. Expecting me to go through ever say log they have ever had since they joined the server is not reasonable.
2 Likes