I also want to add that I wasn’t involved in deleting forum replies, I only got around to replying to this thread now.
Not posting the whole screenshoot be like
I told you i would stop when you stoped calling a photo of a pregnant loli not porn.
To wich you said you would ban me… sooo maybe dont fucking post kid smut and expect to be respected. You also said it is life ruining and i told you this is the internet grow some skin, you arent going to loose your job because kate made a joke on another server.
3 Likes
Yeah, accusations of being a pedophile are potentially life-ruining.
No one posted kid smut, and if I did, you wouldn’t be calling it a joke.
The bottom line is that an admin told you to stop making false accusations, and you didn’t, then you got BTFO’d
What were you expecting?
1 Like
Br a pregnant kid IS smut in my eyes some people are into that shit and i, find it gross coming from a headmin.
5 Likes
what the fuck you posted a picture of a pregnant anime child and are surprised when someone says something??? people are perma banned for posting a copypasta about masterbateing with cartoon toys and you post cartoon children that are pregnant.
3 Likes
Yeah it’s gross, but it’s cringe shit posted as a joke.
It’s not uncommon, and even people like @PowerfulBacon and @Plague saw that it wasn’t CP or anything.
“I posted that. To get a negative reaction” “got a negative reaction” how are you surprised? Is literally what, you wanted
And two people saying it isnt cp wont change mt oppinion a lot of people support random carp but it doesnt make it good.
1 Like
There’s a difference between “ew lmao” and “You are a pedophile who is sexually aroused by this content”
And then you drag it on for several days.
I called you a pedo 2 times on diff days before you banned me.
Edit:ON ANOTHER DISCORD SERVER.
if anyone else posted that they would get a perma ban
4 Likes
You also did it several times on bee.
False statement. I made a joke about my council removal thatsi all
Maybe, but it doesn’t violate any rules. It’s not sexually explicit, so it doesn’t violate rule 5, nor is it pornography.
The thing about WGW, which you mentioned earlier, is that it is sexually explicit.
Can you accept already it is a fucking wrong thing to post and makes youno look bad. Really sometimes you gotts think before posting shit. Or deal whit the consecuences.
Sure. I can accept that posting it was a bad idea.
That still doesn’t make calling me a pedophile okay.
Yes this is sexually explicit, it implies the fucking pig and child had sex how is that not fucking sexually explicit.
3 Likes
There’s no evidence that it’s a child, for one, and second of all, implication and explicitness are mutually exclusive.
That’s the entire point.
I called you aa pedo as a joke two times until you permabanned me. Someone willing tohe gogo that far to deffend himself about something is hidding sumthing most of the time
NO OFFICER SHES 99999 YEARS OLD, fuck, off she even has a kindergarden school bag
1 Like