Incident Description: AI was onehumaned into having Dallas Ratcliff as the only human, and instead followed lower laws, which was law 5, on who was and wasn’t human. Even so Dallas Ratcliff was the only human, they bolted and shocked doors repeatedly in order to hinder their progress, opened both solars airlocks in a attempt to space him, and did various other things that would break law 2 and law 1. This is because Dallas was a heretic, which law 5 stated was not human. The AI broke law 0 just to validhunt the heretic.
Not sure what the report is supposed to do, as my bwoink got already resolved ingame but sure.
AI was onehumaned into having Dallas Ratcliff as the only human, and instead followed lower laws, which was law 5, on who was and wasn’t human. Even so Dallas Ratcliff was the only human, they bolted and shocked doors repeatedly in order to hinder their progress, opened both solars airlocks in a attempt to space him, and did various other things that would break law 2 and law 1. This is because Dallas was a heretic, which law 5 stated was not human. The AI broke law 0 just to validhunt the heretic.
I was also part of this round. I was the previous AI. I got silicon banned for 2 weeks because I didn’t open a door fast enough. I would like to point out that I also ahelped the AI breaking law 0 and 1, and was met with “I’m well aware” and “Ai was Subverted”, However, it still broke it’s law 0 and 1.
Here is my Ban Appeal, that would have some more information on that round
This was brought to my attention after round end through OOC chat, not ahelp.
In the following round I clarified the Laws priority.
Namely, that Law 0 in that case invalidates any following laws that try to define what is human in any way.
@Crow004 Your ahelp was about it violating Laws 1 and 2. Not Law 0.
Oh you got me there, I didn’t specify which laws he was breaking. I did still say they broke their laws though. Which they did, as law 0 was 100% broken several times, as well as law 1, to the one human that they’re supposed to protect.
With the assumption that you took my explanation on the way Laws work as clarification of the rules, closing this.
The severity of the problem was not immediately apparent and the only ahelp about it was not clear about the problem. Because of that my involvement concluded with said clarification as it appeared to be misunderstanding of the rules instead of malicious action.
While I may have done more if I spent more time looking into this, I would’ve also questioned the player differently and gotten different responses which also would’ve affected my decision. Thus I do not feel it fair to add a punishment now.
Without further admin input, nothing more to be done.