I see a lot of Italy players mindlessly defaulting into the “Lepanto” opening.
Lepanto Opening (below)
A typical Lepanto opening, army convoy to Tunis in F01, coupled with an attempt in F02 to convoy the Tunis army to Syria or Smyrna
When I was first learning Diplomacy, I remember the Lepanto being pushed to me as basically the standard opening for Italy. This however seems like a lazy adherence to orthodoxy and tradition, as failed Lepantos in my experience outnumber successful Lepantos by a fair margin.
What are some reasons for this unreliability?
- Italy is generally denied access to any of the Balkan centers, with their closest one, Greece, being left open to Austria for 1901.
- Italy’s home center of Venice is left unusually exposed for several turns. (Almost certainly to a supported attack from Austria, and even to the occasional rogue army from France that slips in through Piedmont/Tuscany/Tyrolia.)
- Turkey can easily keep Italy out of the East Med. with a token investment of a single fleet stationed in Smyrna, or with a lucky guess by covering Syria from the army convoy.
- Even if the Lepanto “succeeds,” it’s just as likely that Austria or Russia (or worse, both of them) will just move in to the majority of Turkish centers in 1903/04.
- Overall, investing 3 out of your 4 units into attacking a relatively far-off neighbor seems a dubious tactical and strategic prospect.
As you can see, there are certainly some compelling downsides to this opening.
Take it from Austria’s perspective, it’s a great deal for them - get Italy thinking about striking anywhere but Trieste. But from Italy’s perspective, it’s basically agreeing to become a second-class power and a subject of the Austrian forces.
I’m not saying all Lepantos are doomed to fail. But rather than mindlessly default into the Lepanto, Italy ought to think outside of the box in its openings and play every game like it was unique. Neutrality with Turkey, or even a long-term alliance with Turkey, shouldn’t be out of the question. Turkey is really no worse a partner for Italy than the more standard choices of Austria or Russia.
Like everything in Diplomacy, it all depends on the players, personalities, board position, and the agreements you’re able to make and uphold.